AI 扩展计划 / Playbooks
ABPA 模板 02：Stakeholder Evidence Map
Questions:
108 行abpa/templates/02-stakeholder-evidence-map.md
Stakeholder Evidence Map
Use this to avoid building for a fake average user. Each stakeholder needs a different evidence path.
1. Stakeholder Summary
| Stakeholder | Role in workflow | Decision power | Success definition | Main concern | Evidence needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline user | high / medium / low | ||||
| Team lead | high / medium / low | ||||
| Compliance / risk | high / medium / low | ||||
| Data owner | high / medium / low | ||||
| IT / platform | high / medium / low | ||||
| Security | high / medium / low | ||||
| Legal / privacy | high / medium / low | ||||
| Executive sponsor | high / medium / low |
2. Interview Cards
Frontline User
| Field | Answer |
|---|---|
| What they do today | |
| What slows them down | |
| What they distrust | |
| What they must control | |
| What would make them adopt | |
| What would make them reject |
Questions:
Compliance / Risk
| Field | Answer |
|---|---|
| Regulatory responsibility | |
| Evidence required | |
| Non-negotiable controls | |
| Review cadence | |
| Incident escalation |
Questions:
Technology / Data
| Field | Answer |
|---|---|
| Systems involved | |
| Integration constraints | |
| Data quality known issues | |
| Access / identity constraints | |
| Operational support constraints |
Questions:
Executive Sponsor
| Field | Answer |
|---|---|
| Strategic objective | |
| Funding threshold | |
| Risk appetite | |
| Time horizon | |
| Decision criteria |
Questions:
3. Conflict Map
| Conflict | Stakeholders | Why it matters | Resolution path |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency vs control | |||
| Automation vs human accountability | |||
| Data access vs privacy | |||
| Vendor speed vs lock-in | |||
| Model quality vs cost |
4. Evidence Plan
| Claim to validate | Evidence source | Method | Owner | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| interview / log analysis / prototype / eval / pilot |