返回 Papers
AI 扩展计划 / Playbooks

ABPA Starter Kit

The ABPA plan is not another note-writing track. The output is a set of business decision artifacts that can survive interviews, consulting discussions, architecture reviews, and delivery governance.

147abpa/README.md

ABPA-180 Starter Kit

ABPA = AI BA x Product x Architect. This folder turns docs/AI_BA_PRODUCT_ARCHITECT_180_PLAN.md from a curriculum into reusable work assets.

Purpose

The ABPA plan is not another note-writing track. The output is a set of business decision artifacts that can survive interviews, consulting discussions, architecture reviews, and delivery governance.

This folder is additive. It does not replace earlier Web3, architecture, Solidity, LLM, DSDB, AIPA, trading, finance-design, or daily-note materials. Those remain useful learning assets. ABPA only adds a BA/PM/architecture lens on top of them.

Use this folder when you want to:

  • start a new AI transformation case study,
  • convert a PRD into eval-ready requirements,
  • explain why an AI system should or should not be built,
  • prepare an AI BA / AI PM / AI Solutions Architect interview story,
  • turn existing AML Copilot work into an executive-ready portfolio artifact.

Folder Structure

PathPurpose
templates/Reusable blank templates for each ABPA asset
capstone-aml/First filled capstone using the existing AML Copilot assets
interview/Interview question bank and answer scaffolds for AI BA / AI PM / AI Architect roles
../LEARNING_ASSET_GOVERNANCE.mdPreservation, review, and portfolio-conversion system for all learning assets
1. Pick a business scenario.
2. Copy the templates you need.
3. Fill evidence before opinion.
4. Map every important requirement to an eval, signal, owner, or control.
5. Summarize the decision in one page.

Evidence Hierarchy

Evidence strengthExamplesHow to use
Strongproduction metrics, labeled external dataset, observed user workflow, CI result, trace exportDecision basis
Mediuminternal synthetic dataset, expert interview, prototype usability test, vendor trialHypothesis support
Weakvendor demo, generic survey, model benchmark unrelated to workflowNever use alone

ABPA Asset Stack

LayerAssetQuestion it answers
ProblemAI Opportunity CanvasIs this worth doing with AI?
PeopleStakeholder Evidence MapWho can make it succeed or fail?
WorkflowBPMN + Pain MetricsWhere does work actually break down?
RequirementsRequirements-to-Eval MatrixHow will we know it works?
DataData Readiness PackIs the data fit for the AI decision?
ArchitectureAI Architecture ADR SetWhich design choices are explicit and reversible?
RiskAI Control PackHow do we prevent and detect harm?
OperationsOperating Model + RACIWho owns the system after launch?
AdoptionAdoption DashboardAre users actually changing their work?
ValueBusiness CaseIs the investment justified by measurable value?
DecisionExecutive Decision MemoWhat should leadership approve now?

Template Index

TemplateUse it when
templates/01-ai-opportunity-canvas.mddeciding whether a scenario deserves AI investment
templates/02-stakeholder-evidence-map.mdmapping who has power, pain, evidence, and objections
templates/03-bpmn-pain-metrics.mdconverting process pain into measurable workflow facts
templates/04-requirements-to-eval-matrix.mdmaking requirements testable through evals and thresholds
templates/05-ai-control-pack.mddesigning AI risk controls and release gates
templates/06-executive-decision-memo.mdsummarizing a decision for sponsors
templates/07-data-readiness-pack.mdproving data quality, labels, access, and governance readiness
templates/08-ai-architecture-adr-set.mddocumenting AI architecture choices and reversal triggers
templates/09-operating-model-raci.mdassigning owners for product, evals, data, risk, operations, and adoption
templates/10-adoption-dashboard.mdtracking usage, trust, quality, behavior change, and value realization
templates/11-business-case.mdturning workflow impact into funding gates and ROI logic
templates/12-portfolio-evidence-map.mdmapping notes, code, PRDs, evals, and capstones into interview evidence

Current Capstone

Start here:

  • capstone-aml/README.md
  • capstone-aml/AML_ABPA_10_DAY_STARTER.md
  • capstone-aml/AML_30_DAY_DEEPENING_PLAN.md

Interview Pack

  • interview/AI_BA_PM_ARCHITECT_INTERVIEW_BANK.md

2026+ AI Expansion Tracks

These are new expansion tracks, not just ABPA starter material:

  • ../AI_2026_EXPANSION_START_HERE.md
  • ../AI_NEW_DEMANDS_2026_EXPANSION.md
  • ../AI_FOUNDATIONS_CLASSIC_PAPERS_PLAN.md
  • ../AGENTIC_ENTERPRISE_ARCHITECTURE_90_PLAN.md
  • ../AI_GOVERNANCE_EVALOPS_RISK_90_PLAN.md
  • ../AI_BA_PM_PRACTICE_LAB.md
  • ../AI_ROLE_COMPETENCY_MATRIX_2026.md
  • ../FINANCIAL_RETAIL_AI_CASE_PORTFOLIO.md
  • ../AI_ARCHITECTURE_DIAGRAM_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_LONG_TERM_KNOWLEDGE_GRAPH_AND_REVIEW_SYSTEM.md
  • ../AI_INTERVIEW_PORTFOLIO_STORYLINE_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_VENDOR_BUILD_BUY_ADOPTION_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_REQUIREMENTS_TO_EVAL_COOKBOOK.md
  • ../AI_OPERATING_MODEL_RACI_RUNBOOK.md
  • ../AI_ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW_GATE_CHECKLISTS.md
  • ../AI_CONTEXT_ENGINEERING_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_EXPANSION_MASTER_INDEX.md
  • ../AI_CASE_DRILL_WORKBOOK_30_DAYS.md
  • ../AI_EXECUTIVE_COMMUNICATION_MEMO_PACK.md
  • ../AI_PLATFORM_PM_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_REGULATORY_RESPONSE_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_DATA_PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_BOARD_AUDIT_COMMITTEE_GOVERNANCE_PACK.md
  • ../AI_CAPABILITY_ASSESSMENT_RUBRIC.md
  • ../AI_RETRIEVAL_EVAL_GRAPH_RAG_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_PLATFORM_SECURITY_GATEWAY_LAB.md
  • ../AI_REGULATOR_EXAM_SIMULATION_PACK.md
  • ../AI_ADVANCED_CASE_DRILL_WORKBOOK_60_DAYS.md
  • ../AI_MEMORY_CONTEXT_STATE_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_MULTI_AGENT_ORCHESTRATION_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_OBSERVABILITY_COST_SLO_PLAYBOOK.md
  • ../AI_AGENT_PROTOCOLS_MCP_A2A_PLAYBOOK.md

It uses existing repository evidence:

  • docs/AML_COPILOT_PRD.md
  • src/aml/types.ts
  • src/aml/evalBaseline.ts
  • src/aml/failureTaxonomy.ts
  • src/aml/groundTruthEval.ts
  • src/aml/__tests__/aml.test.ts
  • src/aml/__tests__/p1evals.test.ts

Quality Bar

An ABPA artifact is complete only if it answers four questions:

  1. What decision does this support?
  2. What evidence backs it?
  3. What uncertainty remains?
  4. What should be tested next?